Archive for the ‘Stories’ Category

Drops & Splashes

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

by Joyce Bedi

Doc originally developed the electronic stroboscope to study problems in large electrical motors. But his first subject outside the engine room was water flowing from a faucet. Perhaps this ignited his lifelong interest in the behavior of drops and splashes of all sorts.

Drops and splashes were among Edgerton’s favorite subjects. For decades, he sought the “perfect” drop. While images like the milk drop hitting a red plate are among Doc’s best known, there was a serious side to these photographs as well.

An entrepreneur at heart, Edgerton campaigned for the strobe’s use among his MIT colleagues, members of local industries, and professional and amateur photographers. In this way, he gained a broad range of experience with the abilities and deficiencies of the strobe and fed this knowledge back into further experimentation. Within a few years of putting the strobe on the market, he had a long list of companies and government agencies that had hired him to look into one problem or another.

For example, in 1939 he collaborated with the U.S. Soil Conservation Dept. on a study of soil erosion. In his notebook he wrote, “Germeshausen and Mr. Laws have been taking 1000/second movies of drops striking soil for the last several days. The drops of H2O come from the ceiling and hit samples below.” He added an image a few pages later about how the movies were created.

But Doc wasn’t all business all the time. His sense of play led to some unusual experimental set-ups. In 1936, he put his camera and strobe at the base of an elevator shaft, and then photographed drops released through a hole in the elevator floor—from the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and eighth floors! When his kind of curiosity and sense of wonder was combined with a keen understanding of photography and electrical engineering, the result was a blurring of the line between technology and art.

Studying the behavior of drops and splashes added to knowledge about surface tension and had both scientific and commercial applications. But Doc’s fascination with such a simple event as a falling drop of liquid is testament to his belief that learning is a lifelong occupation. A gifted teacher, Edgerton was a keen student as well. “I have always empathized with the student who sees new discoveries and knowledge that were not anticipated flowing from the laboratory,” he wrote in 1987. “There is no such thing as a ‘perfect’ result or a complete study of a phenomenon. For example, although I’ve tried for years to photograph a drop of milk splashing on a plate with all the coronet’s points spaced equally apart, I have never succeeded.”

Browse additional notebook pages related to “drops of water”.

Seeing in the Dark

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

by Joyce Bedi

By 1932, Edgerton had turned his experimental strobe apparatus into a commercial product. People outside MIT began to recognize the possibilities of Edgerton’s new tool. On the eve of World War II, the army asked Edgerton to build a strobe for night aerial reconnaissance photography.

In the summer of 1939, Maj. George W. Goddard, a veteran pilot of World War I, paid an unexpected call on Edgerton and his colleagues at the Strobe Lab. Goddard asked Edgerton if a strobe lamp could be built that would be powerful enough to take photographs at night from a height of a mile. Edgerton did some calculations and gave Goddard a tentative “yes.” “We can do that,” Doc said. “We haven’t got it in the house, but we can do that.”

The strobes used to photograph events in Boston Garden provided a technical foundation for Edgerton’s electronic flash for military night aerial photography.
Our knowledge of almost seven years ago indicated that the required kind of flash lamp could probably be built. But there was also a good probability that the lamp would explode during its first, and only, operation because of the intense heat and high pressure developed when the flash occurred. Even an optimist couldn’t feel too encouraged about the prospect of success.
But Edgerton and his team overcame these initial obstacles. The first experimental unit was mounted in an Army Air Forces B-18 bomber and successfully tested over Boston in April 1941. Further development and testing was done in collaboration with Wright Field (now Wright-Patterson Air Force Base) in Dayton, Ohio, before trials and training in England.

The system’s most famous test came on the evening of June 5, 1944, when the night reconnaissance planes took off for Normandy. They were followed shortly by a flying army in C-47s, headed for the D-Day invasion of France. The photographs taken that night showed no movement of enemy forces; the German troops were taken completely by surprise. “The clouds were down to about a thousand feet and the flash bombs couldn’t be used at all. They were designed to work at 10,000 feet,” Edgerton recalled. “So those pictures were useful, they were used all during the war.”

Knowing what an enemy is doing under cover of darkness is important in wartime. Before Doc developed his aerial flash, night reconnaissance photos were made with flash bombs, which are similar to the type of fireworks that explode with a boom and a blinding flash of white light. Flash bombs had a number of limitations: they were dangerous to handle; they used fuses that were preset for a specific altitudes, so pilots couldn’t navigate under cloud cover; and the noise from them often had citizens on the ground running for cover from what they believed was a bombing raid. The electronic flash took care of these shortcomings, though it created some new ones of its own. The main problem to be solved was how to separate the camera and flash as much as possible in the plane to prevent fogging of the film.

Further Reading
Harold Edgerton, Electronic Flash, Strobe, pp. 286-294.
Harold E. Edgerton, “Night Aerial Photography,” Technology Review 29, no. 5 (March 1947): 273.
Nebraska Educational Telecommunications/NOVA, “Edgerton and His Incredible Seeing Machines,” 1985.
Harold E. Edgerton in World War II, 6.933 class project, 2000

Drawing of Strobes on Under Water Vehicle (Bathyscaphe)

Monday, November 9th, 2009

This drawing shows the arrangement of four strobe lights (and their internal circuitry) attached to an arm of Cousteau’s bathyscaphe. Edgerton not only shows where the camera will be positioned, but also includes sketches of some of the creatures he imagines photographing at great ocean depths.

Notebook 22, page 8

November 24, 1953

Shadow Photography (Notebook Page)

Monday, November 9th, 2009

To study microscopic aquatic organisms, like these freshwater copepods, Edgerton used shadow photography – he placed a drip of water directly on the unexposed film and flashed a strobe to capture a silhouette of the creature.

Following standard scientific practice, Edgerton was careful to note all of the variables, like exposure time and type of film, in this experiment.

Notebook 32, page 5

August 30, 1975

Flash! First Book of Edgerton Photographs

Monday, November 9th, 2009

In 1939, Edgerton published his first book of photographs, titled “Flash!” Here Doc (left) poses with Flash! And International News Service photographer George Woodruff, J, Winston Lemen of the Eastman Kodak Co., and colleague Herbert Grier. Doc notes that the photograph was taken with his portable flash unit at Boston’s Parker House Hotel.

Notebook 11, page 44

February 28, 1941

1939 World’s Fair in New York City

Monday, November 9th, 2009

At the 1939 World’s Fair in New York City, Kodak set up a kiosk for taking high-speed photographs with a strobe. In the darkened booth, a large sheet of glass waited for a baseball, shot from a cannon, to smash it into smithereens.

At the moment of impact, the strobe fired. Visitors to the exhibit inserted their cameras in peepholes cut in the kiosk, opened the shutter, and captured the flying shards of glass on film, along with a sign that read “Photographed at 1/100,000 second!”

Notebook 10, page 2

June 14, 1939

Lighting and Camera on Plane (Notebook Page)

Monday, November 9th, 2009

The key to good nighttime aerial photographs was separating the camera and the flash as much as possible. If the flash went off too close to the camera, only the flash would be photographed.

These sketches show some ideas on ways to install the lighting and photography equipment in an A-20 airplane to achieve the needed separation.

Notebook 11, Page 01

September 19, 1943

About Doc’s Notebooks

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

Story about Doc’s notebooks goes here.

Aerial Reconnaissance

Friday, October 30th, 2009
When America entered the war, the US government very quickly discovered what Compton already knew: the union of MIT’s scientific resources and the nation’s specific military needs would prove to be mutually beneficial. In a sense the school itself was drafted into service.

Like every corner of MIT, the Strobe Lab was highly mobilized to serve the military. Major Goddard of Wright Field, Dayton, Ohio visited Edgerton during the summer of 1939 and asked Edgerton to consider the problem of nighttime aerial photography and the need for Edgerton’s control circuits and powerful flash.

This soon opened a whole new line of applications for Edgerton to explore and a whole new value network for his technology. Without doubt, Edgerton’s imagination and free spirit as well as the technical curiosity, which was highly nurtured by the atmosphere and people of MIT, made him highly successful during the war years.

Both Compton and Killian were faced with the challenge of reversing the direction of research from military applications to pure research. Compton started a very strict re-deployment for peace, which affected Edgerton as well as Germeshausen and Grier. Their unofficial partnership was asked to change into a corporation serving mainly the government, specifically the Atomic Energy Commission.

In his unpublished autobiography, Edgerton narrates this decision as:

After the war, the then Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) requested MIT to set up a comprehensive test system at Eniwetok Island with Grier in charge. MIT said “No,” why not have the partners (Edgerton, Germeshausen and Grier) form a corporation to do the job? This was done and as a consequence, EG&G, INC. was started in 1947.8

Bernard O’Keefe, a later partner to EG&G, also talks about the formation of the corporation as a result of MIT’s focus on pure academic research in his book Nuclear Hostages, 1983:

At the time, most of the MIT faculty was back in force, ready to resume teaching and nonmilitary research. MIT and other universities had had a gutful of military research. When the MIT director of research programs heard about the proposed tenfold expansion of our little project [firing of nuclear bombs], he balked, saying that MIT was trying to get out of military research, not into it. He suggested to Grier he and his partners form a corporation to take over the government business and move it off campus. Edgerton and Germeshausen did not care much one way or the other, but Grier thought it was a great idea, so the corporation Edgerton, Germeshausen and Grier Inc, was formed. (p.126-7)

But despite the incorporation of the company, Edgerton was still as active on the MIT front as he used to be. His desire to teach and discover more did not go away and was even more supported by the variety of things he worked on during the war. The scale of his projects had increased immensely.

Read more: Harold E. Edgerton in World War II by Roozbeh Ghaffari, Ozge Nadia Gozum, Katherine Koch, Amy W. Ng, Hua Fung Teh, and Peter Yang.

Introduction

Friday, October 30th, 2009

by Claire Calcagno

In addition to exploring terrestrial subjects, Doc Edgerton was intrigued by the unique engineering challenges of underwater research. In order to “see” underwater, Doc had to design tools that could withstand enormous and varying pressure, stay protected from salt contamination, and record information through remotely operated instruments that could be interpreted by scientists in their research vessels at the surface. Doc developed underwater cameras, lights and deep-sea recording instruments for imaging and detection efforts at the cutting edge of oceanographic research. His underwater instruments, which used light as well as sound to penetrate the dark depths, were applied to many disciplines including geophysics and physical oceanography, to marine biology and underwater archaeology.
Doc’s particular expertise with the generation and precise control of high-energy short pulses – whether for stroboscopes, high-speed flashes or for modulator switches for atom bombs – were turned towards the problems of underwater acoustic waves, to improve and shorten the sound pulse length and thereby improve resolution. His sound-based tools included so-called pingers, thumpers, boomers, sub-bottom profilers, sparkers and side scan sonar.
Limited accessibility – hard to reach areas – raised operating costs astronomically; thus oceanographic expeditions frequently featured several overlapping scientific missions, such as geologic mapping and shipwreck investigations. Doc collaborated with scientists from around the world, including ocean explorers Jacques-Yves Cousteau, Edwin Link, and top scientists from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, which has always had a close affiliation with MIT. Doc’s international reputation and promotion of scholarly exchanges led to his invitation in 1969 to join a Soviet oceanographic team investigating the mid-Atlantic Ridge.
Ever the inspiring teacher, Doc didn’t limit himself to the scientific or academic communities: public outreach was an important part of his mission. Through collaborations with organizations such as the National Geographic Society and the New England Aquarium (which maintains an active Edgerton Research Laboratory), Edgerton communicated with the broadest audiences. Edgerton’s research exemplifies his philosophy as a scientist and engineer: his belief in the primacy of hands-on field research; his appreciation for the potential to make serendipitous discoveries through careful observation; his openness to failure as inspirational challenge.
Friends claimed that Doc must have seen more new things for the first time than any other person in the world.

Underwater Photography

Friday, October 30th, 2009

by Claire Calcagno

In the mid-1930s, Doc was approached by E. Newton Harvey, an expert on bioluminescence, to track and photograph deep-sea bioluminescent fish for his upcoming book. This led Doc to focus on developing cameras, strobes and other instrumentation to be used in the deep sea. He designed his first successful underwater camera for oceanographic research in collaboration with researchers at WHOI in 1937.
Water causes light scattering and absorption effects that act like fog in the air, limiting range and performance. For this reason, photography under water is best used for close-up details, while sonar scanning tools are used for longer-range investigations. Electronic flash systems have become crucial for the development of underwater photography.

Over the decades Doc worked on underwater cameras ranging from hand-held types to stereo, deep-sea, and elapsed time movie cameras and cameras for silhouette photography. Specialized optical lenses were required, as well as effective electrical connections well protected from the corrosive salt water environment.

Doc’s lighting instruments included electronic flash lamps, strobes for a variety of submarine vehicles and strobes for underwater television cameras. As he described it, deep-sea lamp and camera design had to simultaneously balance a number of requirements:  lamps had to produce high intensity of light, feature a strong container with high mechanical strength to withstand incredible pressure, and function with high efficiency to conserve batteries for missions that required hours for deploying and retrieving instruments, in addition to research bottom time.

Fieldwork out in the oceans was extremely demanding and unforgiving, but Doc seemed to maintain unflagging enthusiasm and optimism in the face of the direst technological mishaps – and bouts of debilitating seasickness. 

Underwater sonar acoustics

Friday, October 30th, 2009

by Claire Calcagno

Scientists turn to acoustic instruments to “see” through water because water becomes opaque to light rays within short distances: in Doc’s words, there is always “bad weather” under water, the equivalent of perpetual fog in the air.

Acoustic waves provide the means to make observations and measurements, as well as to communicate, under water. By measuring the time it takes for a sound pulse to reach an observer, it is possible to measure the distance between that source and the observer. Distances can be similarly calculated by timing the return echo of a sound pulse emitted by the observer.

During his first expedition with Cousteau, Edgerton noticed incidentally that with his depth-measuring sonar ‘pinger,’ the bottom signal had character: that is, the sound penetrated through the surface sediments and reflected off layers below the bottom sea floor. In his words, “it showed us more than we needed to see” — a phenomenon that piqued his interest and provided inspiration for a new path in his ocean engineering designs.

For the next several decades Edgerton worked on improving his sonar instrument, or sub-bottom profiler, which he nick-named a ‘mud penetrator’, to probe the sea floor seeking to identify and record what lay beneath the sediments. The constant challenge he faced was to balance the competing desires for precision and range: higher acoustic frequency gives greater precision but lower distance range, and vice versa. Sound is also absorbed differentially according to the type of sediment being examined and the interference such as caused by gas bubbles. So Edgerton sought as many opportunities as possible to field-test his experimental instruments in the greatest variety of conditions to determine their working parameters and optimize their performance.

Doc’s reach extended to the deepest layer of the earth’s crust, located with a Doc-designed ‘boomer’ and sampled for the first time from the Puerto Rico Trench with scientists of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute in 1960. He also spent many summers working with archaeologists who had begun exploring the underwater realm in earnest in the 1960s.

Edgerton experimented by shifting the angle of the sonar beam sideways, realizing that this was a way to be able to detect objects proud of the sea bed. His former student and onetime colleague Martin Klein went on to develop the first commercially viable dual-channel side scan sonar, based on these beginnings, becoming a recognized leader in the field.

The sonar instrument is typically towed behind a vessel on an instrument platform, or “fish”. With side scan sonar a fan-shaped beam of sound is directed off both sides of the survey ship, and typically surveys swaths of a few hundred meters to either side. The reflected sound is then recorded visually onto a recorder on board the ship.

Once again, the challenge was to balance range and resolution: the need for high resolution for clarity of image, and exended range so that coverage of the sea floor was as effective as possible. Edgerton’s 1986 publication Sonar Images, which brings together dozens of examples of his own sonargraphs as well as those recorded by colleagues at a wide variety of locations over the decades, amply illustrates the progress made from the earliest efforts of recording to results such as achieved by Marty Klein, featured on the cover of the volume – approaching photographic clarity.

Cousteau Collaborations

Friday, October 30th, 2009

by Claire Calcagno

Doc Edgerton’s fascination with underwater acoustical studies first began on a collaborative oceanographic project with Jacques-Yves Cousteau in the summer of 1952. Cousteau contacted Edgerton because he needed improved lighting methods and cameras for his deep-sea investigations.

On their first 1953 cruise together, a recurring concern as they lowered the cameras and strobe lights to photograph the depths, was how to monitor the camera’s position in relation to the sea floor. Edgerton adapted a simple depth-sounder which he attached to the camera, and thereby greatly improved their photographic efforts. The sonar bottom signal would trigger the camera and lights; the echo could be read by the operator who would then know that the device was in the correct range. He called it a ‘pinger’.

Doc Edgerton had a deep friendship with Commandant Jacques-Yves Cousteau since their first meeting at MIT in April 1952, and they continued working together into the 1980s on dozens of missions around the world.

Underwater Vehicles

Friday, October 30th, 2009

by Claire Calcagno

Doc Edgerton spent much of his time designing instruments specifically to mount on deep submergence underwater vehicles. They ranged from camera and strobe systems that he called “robots” mounted on tow sleds improvised out of boat ladders, to state-of-the-art self-propelled submersibles such as the Alvin. His underwater strobe lights provided illumination for an array of instruments to document and measure the sea depths and its residents, and his sonar tools assisted in locating and tracking these instruments during their deployment.

In underwater exploration there are those who favor remote sensing systems to explore remote depths, and those who maintain that a human presence, despite the much greater risks and costs, intrinsically surpasses the value of indirectly monitored sensors. In this discussion, Edgerton was typically eager to help both camps, although from his correspondence it seems he favored remote sensing – what today is known as telepresence. A similar debate  has  characterized space exploration; it touches on fundamental philosophical questions about technology’s role in acquiring and interpreting knowledge.

Doc’s collaborations with Jacques Cousteau led him to participate in several pioneering efforts at human-presence underwater exploration starting in the mid-1950s. Cousteau’s Soucoupes, or “diving saucers,” ferried pairs of researchers through seas and lakes around the world – with illumination provided by Doc’s ever-evolving strobe lights and sonar positioning devices. Doc also participated in engineering research for the French Navy’s bathyscaphe FNRS III stationed in Toulon, skippered by Lt. Cmd. Georges Houot. Through this connection Doc also assisted in outfitting the Piccard-designed Trieste bathyscaphe, but to his enormous frustration was prevented by unforeseen circumstances from delivering his lights for the famous – and as yet unrivaled — descent of the Trieste to the deepest point in the Earth’s oceans, Challenger Deep in the Marianas Trench, in January 1960. After this Doc was relentless in promoting the importance of photographic documentation of any deep-sea exploration effort, and he did have success with the later incarnation of Trieste II reconfigured for the Office of Naval Research a few years later.
The 1960s was a decade of revolutionary deep-sea exploration – in tandem with developments in space exploration. Other manned vehicles that featured Edgerton-designed strobe lights and sonar pingers include the French deep submergence vehicle Archimede, Cousteau’s underwater human habitat Conshelf III, Edwin Link’s Johnson Sea Link submersible, WHOI’s submersible Alvin, and the first submersible designed specifically for underwater archaeological exploration, the Asherah. And in later years, lights designed by his company’s subsidiary provided illumination for the remotely operated vehicle “Jason Jr.” used to document the newly discovered Titanic shipwreck site.

Akademik Kurchatov

Friday, October 30th, 2009

by Claire Calcagno

Harold Edgerton was always keen to promote the use of his underwater instruments, and to learn about alternative designs from colleagues around the world.

Doc had a unique opportunity to collaborate with Soviet colleagues in 1969, when he was invited to be a guest scientist on board the USSR’s research vessel R/V Akademik Kurchatov. Edgerton had met one of the chief scientsts on board, Gleb Udintsev, at an oceanography conference in 1961 in Honolulu. Their mission was to investigate and map an area of the Mid-Atlantic Rift Valley. Edgerton brought along a student of his, Jim Sholer (MIT Class of 1971) and Mike Hobart as assistants with his deep-sea photographic equipment during the expedition.

The expedition epitomized the ideal of international collaboration among scientists that characterized the era, while at the same time underscoring the latent competitiveness stoked by Cold War attitudes. Nonetheless, When Edgerton found himself surrounded by Russians at the moment of the American Moon landing, he was fëted with vodka and song along with his fellow American passengers. As he wrote to Melvin M. Payne and his sponsors at the National Geographic Society, “The impact of this “moon walk” has been terrific…”

Marine Biology

Friday, October 30th, 2009

by Claire Calcagno

Doc Edgerton describes how he was first drawn to the challenges of underwater instrumentation by a marine biologist who needed underwater lights and cameras to document luminescent fish, in the later 1930s. While this first effort was not fully successful in producing legible images, Doc was immediately tantalized by the potential of underwater research: as he put it, underwater photography had the unique capacity to reveal “a host of items unsuspected and illuminate a variety of others which for long have resided in the limbo of half-knowledge”. He went on to assist marine biologists in their scientific inquiries in a broad variety of ways.

A fundamental problem about photographing the underwater world was how to record selected objects of interest on the sea bottom or in the open sea. With biological organisms that were mobile and often frightened by lights, this problem was compounded. Initially, images of organisms captured on film were recorded by chance, and it was not always possible to determine the depth at which their picture had been taken – not very useful documentation for biologists studying habitats and ecologies. Doc’s sonar positioning systems would play a crucial role in adding meaning to these efforts, to relay information about where and when an image was triggered to the scientists on board the research ship at the surface.

 

Early on Doc designed a system which he [prosaically/pragmatically] called an interruption camera, by which a passing animal would interrupt a light beam and thereby trigger the camera shutter and its associated flash illumination to take its picture. In the early 1940s he thought to apply underwater high-speed motion cameras to tracking the rapid movement of marine organisms such as the seahorse, opening a new avenue of locomotor research to the underwater realm.

For slow-motion organisms he delighted people with his underwater time-lapse photography of seemingly static organisms such as sea urchins, sand dollars and starfish, which he researched with Kenneth Read in the later 1960s. These tools also provided important data for scientists examining the biological reworking of sediments: that is, sea bottom erosion caused by marine organisms.

 

In the late 1950s Doc designed a successful luminescence camera together with L. R. Breslau, for working down to depths of 6,000 m.: the luminescent flashing of marine organisms would trigger a deep-sea underwater camera and thus take pictures of the animals producing the flashes. And with his silhouette photography cameras, which he began experimenting with during his expeditions with Jacques Cousteau in the 1950s, Edgerton assisted scientists in studying live marine micro-organisms in their natural habitat. Scientists such as Peter B. Ortner were finally able to quantify and distinguish micro-organism populations living at sea. A laboratory-based system Doc developed was also valuable, in which micro-organisms are placed directly on light sensitive film emulsion, and the photograph is exposed by using a tiny electronic flash; where the organism is translucent enough, the flash can reveal its internal structure.

Doc marveled that with his deep-sea lights and cameras designed to withstand the enormous pressures of the depths, he could find and reveal animals that had been inaccessible before – as he put it, that had never cast a shadow, let alone seen light.

 

Shipwreck Studies

Friday, October 30th, 2009

by Claire Calcagno

Edgerton’s involvement with archaeology developed as an indirect consequence of his collaboration on an oceanographic project with Jacques-Yves Cousteau in 1953, at the ancient wreck site of the Grand Congloué in southern France. This was the first underwater archaeology project ever conducted by scuba-divers, a new technology that was opening up the seas to those interested in cultural as well as natural resources. Doc assisted Cousteau’s diving team with his strobe lights and sonar camera locator. Soon he began to focus on developing sonar instruments to scan and probe the sea bed for shipwreck sites. A few years later his underwater strobe lights were featured on the first submersible designed specifically for underwater archaeology, the Asherah.
 

Doc’s lights, cameras and sonar tools could be applied to archaeological search projects, surveys and for more detailed investigations of submerged sites, to record and document objects proud of seabed, and anomalies beneath sediments. Today sonar is the most commonly used remote sensing tool for detecting shipwrecks, artifacts and other cultural resources. Edgerton’s participation at dozens of underwater archaeology research projects around the world provides a valuable source of understanding into the symbiotic relationship between technology and archaeology in submerged environments.

 

Following his 1953 cruise, Edgerton had many opportunities on subsequent Calypso research expeditions to dive on ancient wrecks and observe Cousteau exploring the potentials of underwater archaeological research. Many of his archaeological connections over the following decades stemmed from his close working relationships established with Cousteau and his team of pioneering divers, oceanographic engineers and geologists. As word spread about Edgerton’s sonar ‘pinger’ that could perhaps trace buried objects, Edgerton began sending his students to deploy and test his prototype sub-bottom profiling instruments at underwater archaeological sites.

Field-testing his instruments at submerged archaeological sites was valuable to his own research as well as to the new sub-discipline of underwater archaeology. So Edgerton joined search and survey projects around the world, ranging from shipwrecks to sunken cities to harborworks; from the Late Bronze Age to the Age of Exploration up to the 20th century; from the Mediterranean to the South Pacific. He was ever ready to volunteer to join a team, and worked with whatever means were available for him to field-test his equipment. He often brought along his sonar equipment at his own expense; he also secured funding and publication opportunities for his archaeologist colleagues (particularly through his connections at National Geographic Society).

 

Edgerton first used side scan sonar successfully to locate a modern wreck site off the Massachusetts coast, the Vineyard Lightship, in 1963. The first side scan sonar search to positively identify an ancient shipwreck (off the coast of Turkey in 1967) was conducted with a side scan sonar of his design, by a former MIT student of his, Martin Klein (MIT ’62) near the site of Yalikavak in SW Turkey. Only a couple of months later, using both a side scan sonar and a sub-bottom profiler, Edgerton and his team assisted in locating the Mary Rose (King Henry VIII’s flagship) which sank in 1545. Edgerton used his mud penetrator to search for the ancient harbor city of Helike, lost to an earthquake in the fourth century BCE – although his searches did not prove successful. Nevertheless Edgerton’s field and lab notes indicate that although specific targets might not always have been identified, nonetheless the sheer volume of sonar testing data retrieved, made his trips a success in his eyes.

Over the years Edgerton presented his fieldwork results to the broader archaeological community, encouraging the use of sonar surveying instruments, through conference talks and articles published in specialized journals in their field. The archaeological community has clearly acknowledged his contributions: in 1989, shortly before his death, Edgerton was presented with the “Pomerance Medal for Scientific Achievements in Archaeology,” issued by the Archaeological Institute of America.

 

Edgerton offered archaeologists new ways to see with sound waves through water and beneath the sediments. While he modestly referred to his archaeological collaborations as “creative mischief”, he acknowledged his debt to archaeological fieldwork for his own career in a telling fashion. For the frontispiece of his collection of sonargraphs reflecting a career of work, Sonar Images, published in 1986, he chose to illustrate an artifact retrieved from that Grand Congloué wreck-site he had first explored with Cousteau in 1953. The artifact, a Roman sounding lead, represents the earliest known instrument used to measure sea depth and provide diagnostic information about the sea bottom sediments — indeed, an ancient analog to Edgerton’s own instruments.

 

http://edgerton-digital-collections.org